![]() The results of this study suggest that nonmobilized communities should not necessarily be understood as sites of consent. Yet in interviews, some residents express a wide range of grievances and describe their efforts, as individuals, to resist the negative impacts of the oil and gas industry on their lands and livelihoods. ![]() The lack of collective mobilization in each case results from ambivalent perceptions of the oil and gas industry, combined with a paucity of organizational capacity and political opportunities. What explains this absence of collective action, and what do discontented people do when their communities lack the conditions for mobilization? In southern Saskatchewan (Canada) and northeastern Pennsylvania (US), rural landowners rarely express opposition through collective actions such as demonstrations, petitions, or civil disobedience. However, rural residents of many “fracked” regions have been quiet about their experiences with the oil and gas industry. In North America, regulations on unconventional oil and gas development are emerging and changing in response to growing public pressure from national environmental organizations and local, grassroots alliances.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |